Countryloves

 In a series of recently shared photos, singer J97 appeared in a simple gray T-shirt, pants rolled up neatly, and barefoot as he joined local residents in cleaning up the streets of Hue after the floods. He helped collect trash, clear mud, and rearrange damaged belongings for the villagers. The photos quickly went viral on social media, drawing tens of thousands of comments and shares.

Under the comment section, besides some negative opinions accusing him of “putting on a show” or “image washing,” many others expressed sympathy and support:

“Helping others is always a good thing. The past is the past — what matters is what he’s doing now.”

“Well, doing something good for society is already nice. No need to judge too harshly.”

“Everyone makes mistakes, but owning up and changing is what really counts.”

“Be fair — good deeds deserve recognition.”

Earlier, on November 7, the Hanoi Department of Culture and Sports had issued an administrative fine of 55 million VND and suspended J97’s performance activities for nine months. The penalty was considered strict, reflecting the authorities’ determination to uphold cultural and artistic standards.

Now, the image of J97 in his sportswear, sweating among the crowd, perhaps makes some people see him in a slightly different light.

 Jack and Many Vietnamese Artists Face the Question: Art for Creativity or for Crossing the Line?”

In recent days, the name Jack has once again become the center of public debate after the People’s Public Security Newspaper published an article addressing the responsibility of artists in preserving cultural values and guiding social awareness. Not only Jack, but several other young Vietnamese artists were also mentioned, as the entertainment industry faces a crucial question: Is art about freedom, or about responsible boundaries?

More  related: https://cand.com.vn

 If this world lacks the concept of love between male and female, with only sexuality and the maintenance of reproduction, it would result in a different societal future compared to our current world. Here are some potential consequences that could occur in that scenario:

1. **Diminished Emotions and Bonding:** Absence of love between male and female could lead to reduced depth of connection and emotions among individuals. Sexuality and reproductive maintenance might become physical activities people engage in to ensure the existence of the species without the emotional element.

2. **Enhanced Focus on Science and Technology:** With the primary focus on reproductive maintenance, society might prioritize the development of science and technology more strongly. Issues such as optimizing the reproduction process and advancing technologies related to reproduction could become top priorities.

3. **Shift in Social Perceptions:** Without love between male and female, notions of relationships and family could change. The concept of family might center more on caring for and nurturing offspring without the need for strong emotional involvement between two individuals.

4. **Psychological and Sexual Challenges:** Separating love and sexuality could potentially lead to psychological and sexual challenges for individuals. People might feel like something crucial is missing in their lives when the emotional component in creating offspring is absent.

5. **Impact on Culture and Arts:** Culture, arts, and literature often reflect love and male-female relationships. If love is no longer a significant aspect of life, they could undergo significant changes in expression and conveying meaning.

6. **Effect on Diversity:** Love between male and female has contributed to the diversity of human beings by creating a unique blend of gender differences. Eliminating this aspect could lead to a decrease in diversity in psychological and social aspects.

Please note that this is purely speculative about a future scenario, and it might not encompass all specific consequences. Love, sexuality, and male-female relationships are complex facets that affect many aspects of human life.